Wednesday, March 29, 2023

2020 Jeep Wrangler EcoDiesel First Drive | Oil Burnin' Off-Road

Main 2020 Jeep Wrangler EcoDiesel First Drive | Oil Burnin' Off-Road

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #92462
    admin
    Keymaster



    If you’re looking for the Wrangler with the most torque to support future mods, the longest range for going farther down the trail, or if you simply want the most …

    #92463
    jokerface6950

    rather buy gladiator .. for 60k

    #92464
    Wowa 75

    N. American small diesels are a joke with all the emissions hardware needed. All adds up to worse performance, mpg and engine longevity than was ever intended. Finally through my 2014 ecodiesel 1500 warranty! Decat, reflashed ecu and exhaust mod coming up for the real diesel experience.

    #92465
    Shane T

    There’s gonna be LOTS of pissed owners when they have to deal with that POS engines high repair bills

    #92466
    sonny baldwin

    Oil burning??????

    #92467
    Sim Ba

    Too complex and expensive ….I wait for the full electric…no rush to buy

    #92468
    Andreina Rangel

    Not a "spendy option". Diesel is a "tax-you-to-death option"

    #92469
    rick baker

    Should have been a Cummins instead of a cheap Italian engine

    #92470
    sicDaVid

    Still a fiat

    #92471
    darren white

    If they come to Australia they'll be $100k

    #92472
    Jonathan Derise

    still can only tow 3500 ,

    #92473
    Daniel Brix

    Will it be sold in Europe?

    #92474
    Mladen

    First they screwed up vw and audi, so now they're advertising a new diesel. To be clear, no one can make a better diesel engine than vw, Audi and Mercedes. Everything else is rubbish.

    #92475
    Denys A

    Don't forget, the Grand Cherokee also has a V6 diesel. I own one. It's terrific!

    #92476
    Mike P.

    Now. Put power seats in it so we can get a comfortable ride, or at least offer it as an option.

    #92477
    Chris Gleeton

    Holy crap, was this filmed at Sand Hollow recreation area?  I recognize it from Matt's towing and recovery…

    #92478
    Mike D

    12:15   very poorly made statement… no difference?  town 3000# with each and look at your fuel economy..  there may be "no difference" in towing capacity..due to frame etc, sure… but "no difference" I would bet strongly that Is not the case

    #92479
    Mike D

    8:00… is it just me or does anyone else fell like they would have been better off with some kind of quick release for the rear glass as opposed to the sides?  I always thought that would be a nice option for those that prefer the hardtop but want to go more open air. I think Freedom tops off and rear glass out would be nice going down the road at any speed.

    #92480
    Mike D

    I know its not really what this video is about, but I really like the tan seats…

    #92481
    Blake Swan

    Wouldmbe so much better and $2k cheaper with a manual gearbox option. Really dissapointed you can't even get the diesel in the 2 door version as well. Jeep has officially sold out

    #92482
    Roger Moore

    I still prefer gasoline over diesel engine.

    #92483
    Topgun 86

    If you would pay $57,000 for a Wrangler over what else is out their, more power to you!

    #92484
    James Mastroianni

    Towing is going to be more for the Gladiator diesel since it was built with towing in mind. Now we know the limit of this engine is around 11,000lbs with the RAM 1500, so the Gladiator will definitely be break/chassis limited, although Ford F150 with a 4200lb curb weight advertises you can tow 13,000lbs, so considering the Gladiator weighs at LEAST 4,650lbs, you could see 9-10k towing out of a midsize if FCA really built the Gladiator based on the 1500 and not the Wrangler.

    Also so many FCA haters in the comments. Best part is is that most probably never owned a Chrysler/FCA vehicle at any point in their life and just go by online forms or what their buddy who does 20k mile oil changes says.

    #92485
    Jason Herrlich

    Get a Roxor for the real Jeep experience.

    #92486
    Mark C

    This review could be over in 0.5 secs. It's a Jeep so it's the worst 4×4 lemon you could buy

    #92487
    ckkone

    People who spend $60k and justify it by claiming fuel savings really have no clue…

    #92488
    Chadd Thompson

    If you are thinking of getting one of these do your research on the Ecodiesel. Even ecodiesel issues aside with the emissions on new diesel engines, idling is one of the worst things you can do to them due to the DPF/DEF system and if you off road much you are going to be spending a lot of time at or near idle.

    #92489
    AlaskaErik

    Most Jeeps wind up being a pavement princess.  My 2015 Rubicon was bought strictly as an off-road toy.  I see no advantage to having a diesel for most off-road applications.  Most people I know do a 2.5 to 3.5 inch lift and put on 35 inch tires.  The unmodified 3.6 gasser is more than adequate for off-roading in the vast majority of off-road trips.  I think a 4 cylinder diesel would have made much more sense.  If I were to buy a JL, I'd consider the 4 cylinder gasser over the diesel.  But, then again, I'm using mine as an off-road toy.  And the 4:1 transfer case in the Rubicon will let me go anywhere a diesel will.  Probably even more places, due to the much lighter weight.

    #92490
    Rick Sizemore

    it's suh-hair-uh.

    #92491
    Oto Sere

    "miles ahead of the 4Runner in refinement" HA! Even jeep owners know you are wrong

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.